Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Suarez Banned for 8 Matches. What Now for Liverpool?

‘Suarez banned for eight games’ screamed the roadside banners this morning as it would have on the headlines of major sports dailies around the world.

It’s taken a little over two months and this outcome has been one that every Liverpool fan and indeed the club would have dreaded since the FA officially charged Suarez with making a racist and offensive remark towards Manchester United’s Patrice Evra a little over a month ago.

Signed as a support striker to Fernando Torres, Suarez soon became the focal point of Liverpool’s attack. He came to embody a dynamism on the third half of the pitch that Liverpool had lacked in previous seasons; seasons where they have quite frankly fallen short of their lofty standards.

The Uruguayan - gifted with an embarrassing assortment of technical skills has a suspect temperament that is unfortunately a flaw with most prodigiously talented footballers. And I think that it is that disposition that has let him down in a busy festive period that his club is likely to require his services the most.

His scrapes with footballing authorities in the past reads like a charge sheet for a profligate teenager who knows his skills are enough to mitigate against serious reprimands but I dare say it would be short-sighted to see him as a racist on the basis of his previous misdemeanours or for his recent spat with Patrice Evra.

An eight match ban and a £40,000 fine seems like a harsh sentence but there will be a bevy of commentators out there who would think that an appropriate sentence has been finally meted after what was perceived as a lengthy delay in deliberating the issue.

They would look at it as a significant statement for the fight against racism and one that has the potential to act as a deterrent for future misconduct of this ilk. 

The FA contends that Suarez used:

“insulting words towards Mr Evra during the match contrary to FA Rule E3 (1). The insulting words used by Mr Suarez included a reference to Mr Evra's colour within the meaning of Rule E3 (2). Mr Suarez shall be warned as to his future conduct, be suspended for eight matches covering all first team competitive matches and fined the sum of £40,000.

The [penalty] is suspended pending the outcome of any appeal lodged by Mr Suarez against this decision."


They have been careful not to label him as a racist and rightly so but the argument that they word ‘Negrito’ which Suarez was alleged to have used against Evra connotes something different (friend) in South American lexicon is in my opinion as spurious as any claim that purports that the lad is racist. The word while ambivalent in its meaning in Latin America is clearly pejorative if used in the context of a tinder box derby like was witnessed on the 15th of October between Liverpool and Manchester United.    
Liverpool have vowed to stand behind their talismanic striker and are already looking to study the full details of the verdict as soon as it is released by the FA. They have a 14 day period to appeal but will probably be aware that any appeal is likely to be doomed for failure especially with a football body that seems really intent on making a categorical statement against racism.

Perhaps of more anxiety to them will be the fact that they will be losing a player who has assumed a dimension of irreplaceability at a time when they would need him the most. His loss may act as catalyst to a slide down the Premiership table where they may once again watch glorious European nights from the comforts of Anfield - wistfully reflecting on the if’s and why’s of another unsuccessful season or it might not be as cataclysmic as feared.

In Andy Carroll they have a striker who is not yet firing on all cylinders and has yet to justify the £35 million pounds paid to bring him to Anfield. He might yet see this as an opportunity to step up and fulfil an obvious potential that made critics tout him as the next Alan Shearer. A lot also depends on Kenny Dalglish at a time like this.

Will he see Suarez’s ban as the perfect opportunity to instil a siege mentality within his team or will Liverpool continue to dwell on a contentious incident that could completely derail their season? 

By Abiye Opuamah from Talk EPL

Related posts:
The Brilliance and Impudence of Luis Suarez
Luis Suarez: The Complete Striker

Monday, December 19, 2011

Liverpool Beat Aston Villa - Bellamy Shines

On Sunday Liverpool traveled to Villa Park to take on an Aston Villa team who had been struggling of late, especially at home. Conversely the Reds have traveled well this season and have the fourth best away record in the League.
Craig Bellamy, who switched flanks with Stewart Downing, had a storming game and bossed the left side of the park. He linked up well with Luis Suarez and Jose Enrique.

He scored the first goal of the afternoon following a Downing corner, and he set up the second with his own great corner which was whipped in at pace. Martin Skrtel met the inswinger with an excellent header to put the Reds 2-nil up within 15 minutes.


The two quick goals effectively killed the game and the rest of the match proved to be quite a drab affair with Villa offering nothing at all going forwards.

Stewart Downing received vociferous abuse for the entire game from his previous club’s fans, but he could finally afford a smile at the end of the game with the points wrapped up.

Luis Suarez put the home defence under pressure with his trademark mazy runs and twice hit the woodwork in the second half. This brings Liverpool’s record of hitting the posts to 17 for the season; far beyond any other team.

In fact, Villa’s goal led a charmed life, with the woodwork, desperate defending and poor finishing all contributing to Liverpool not extending their lead.

But the day belonged to Bellamy who put in arguably his best performance of the season. For Villa it was another day of no goals, which it had been for four of the last five games.

Two-nil it finished and a good three points for the visitors, but there is still lots of improvement to be done in the final third. Wasted chances this season have cost the Reds many goals and a truckload of points.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

The Irritation of Players’ Simulation

During Chelsea’s 3-o victory against Valencia in the Champion’s League I noticed a negative point that really irked me.
Raul Meireles went in to win a ball and caught a defender’s arm on his chest. He went down in apparent agony clutching his face.  Replays showed that the Portuguese international wasn’t touched anywhere near his face, and had only received a slight brush across his chest area.
 

This type of simulation and play-acting always frustrates and maddens me; how can a grown man pretend to be hurt and act like that? How does he still walk down the street as a proud and popular man?   If I acted like a baby like that I would be completely embarrassed and hide from the public for months.

Of course the former-Liverpool man is not the only one; unfortunately the Barclays Premier League is full of these over-exaggerating play-actors who do their best to win free-kicks from phantom fouls, or to get opposition players sent off with their Oscar-nominee performances.

I keep thinking back to the British players from the sixties and seventies who used to play through broken noses, dislocated shoulders and horrendous tackles, and what they must think of today’s Premier League Pansies.
 
Other Related Posts:
When players know it not their ball, but scream for it anyway in "It’s a corner, Ref!"
David Ngog goes for the Swan Dive in Another Day Another Diver (with a funny video)
Suarez rolling on the ground in The Impudence of Luis Suarez